✦ Intelligence Layer
Procurement Intelligence
NoHarm generates structured, comparable signals for complex technologies.
Structured signals·Comparable evaluations·Decision intelligence
✦ Indicators
Performance & Readiness Indicators
Technologies are assessed against defined criteria to produce consistent outputs.
- Performance validation indicators
- Deployment readiness classification
- Compliance alignment markers
- Risk exposure signals
Performance Validation
Strong82/100
Deployment Readiness
Moderate67/100
Compliance Alignment
Strong91/100
Risk Exposure
Elevated34/100
✦ Comparison
Comparable Decision Inputs
Every assessment follows the same logic, enabling meaningful comparison.
- Standardized scoring methodology
- Side-by-side evaluation views
- Transparent criteria weighting
- Traceable decision records
Criteria
Tech A
Tech B
Data Handling
88
72
Scalability
74
81
Compliance
92
65
Risk Profile
45
38
Overall
74.8
64.0
✦ Evolution
Evolving Evaluation Criteria
Intelligence adapts as deployment outcomes and regulatory contexts evolve.
- Criteria refinement
- Version-controlled assessments
- Updated risk classifications
- Longitudinal performance tracking
v3.2
Updated risk classifications
Feb 2026Current
v3.1
Added deployment readiness criteria
Jan 2026Archived
v3.0
Regulatory alignment update
Dec 2025Archived
✦ Get in touch
Contact Us
Ready to reshape your institution's technology procurement? Get in touch to learn how NoHarm can help.
Contact Us →